Posts Tagged ‘Twistery’

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2012

The complete 12 Days of Twistmas…

So, Twistmas is over for another year. I managed to post a different, new twistery every day for 12 days up to and including Christmas Day. A rather crazy and pointless task I set myself, but I did it nonetheless. I hope anyone who took the trouble to look in over that time enjoyed the twisteries.

For those of you who missed them, I thought I would post all 12 Days of Twistmas together now, with links back to their solutions. Time to finish up that last slice of Twistmas cake as you peruse the puzzles.

The First Day of Twistmas

She swam in the marina while he tinkered with the boat. She was a strong swimmer, so why did she drown just as she was about to climb out?

Solution

The Second Day of Twistmas

He got up from the picnic and walked off the cliff to his death. His wife blamed it on their daughter’s crippling medical condition.

Solution

The Third Day of Twistmas

The ricin-extraction manual proved death came from a castor bean plant, though no trace of poison was found in her system.

Solution

The Fourth Day of Twistmas

No one understood why he drove into the mountainside until forensics found traces of fine gauze on the bonnet of the wrecked car.

Solution

The Fifth Day of Twistmas

The bank robbers’ C-list celebrity masks threw the police off the scent. The breakthrough? Traces of animal hair in a dropped bag.

Solution

The Sixth Day of Twistmas

3 pathologists failed to find a cause of death though all remarked on the mysterious pinpricks in the dead hypochondriac’s skin.

Solution

The Seventh Day of Twistmas

The murder weapon, a sword, was still lodged in the victim’s body, yet there was no blood & cause of death was given as asphyxia.

Solution

The Eighth Day of Twistmas

Internally locked room. Victim alone, holding a box with a hole in it. Head blown apart. Locked in the box: a gun & a loop of fishing line.

Solution

The Ninth Day of Twistmas

It looked like a suicide pact. The 2 bodies lay together. But why the separate suicide notes & why had she shot herself & he taken poison?

Solution

The Tenth Day of Twistmas

“As you deal so shall you die,” was scrawled in blood above the butchered meat-packing executive. Yellow petals were scattered on his body.

Solution

The Eleventh Day of Twistmas

“I am innocent!” declared Hélène, thereby proving her guilt.

Solution

The Twelfth Day of Twistmas

He admitted keeping victims in steel boxes. Were they dead or alive? Yes & no. He sent the police a letter to explain: ψ.

Solution



Sunday, December 25th, 2011

The Twelfth Day of Twistmas (Twistery #35)

He admitted keeping victims in steel boxes. Were they dead or alive? Yes & no. He sent the police a letter to explain: ψ.

 

Solution.

The suspect was Professor Rudy Applebaum. Three of his graduate students had gone missing, Dennis Lee, Ranbir Kapur, and Amelia Quirke.  They had all been on their way to see him at the time of their disappearance. But no bodies had been found. Nothing, as yet, could be proven.

Professor Applebaum was the archetypal mad professor. Wiry hair all over the place, bottle-end lenses in his glasses, shapeless jumpers, insane giggle, staring eyes, an over-excited manner and a tendency to spit and dribble as he spoke. All the classic signs were there. He also had an annoying habit of speaking in riddles.

Detective Inspector Stafford wasn’t standing for it. “What have you done with them?”

“An interesting question, Inspector, though perhaps the real question is, What haven’t I done with them? Doesn’t it occur to you that I may have both done something with them and not done something with them?  It may be true to say that I have killed them. It may also be true to say that they are still alive.”

“Look, matey, I never went to university, so I don’t appreciate all that doublespeak.”

The professor gave a manic giggle. “Technically, it’s not doublespeak. Doublespeak is when you say one thing but mean something else. I said two things and meant them both.”

“I give up,” said Stafford. He turned to his second-in-command, DS Ringer. “You have a go, son.” To Applebaum, he added: “Detective Sergeant Ringer is a graduate.”

Ringer  grimaced at Applebaum’s mocking laughter. “Professor, how can you say two different things and mean them both?”

“Have you never heard of Schrodinger’s cat?”

“Who’s Schrodinger?” cut in Stafford.

“Will you tell him or shall I?” said Professor Applebaum. “Or perhaps we should both? Or neither of us? Or both of us and neither of us. Perhaps we should let Schrodinger’s cat tell him.”

“I’d like you to tell us,” said Ringer.

“Schrodinger was an Austrian physicist who came up with a thought experiment. You know what thought is?”

“There’s no need to take that tone,” said Stafford.

“His experiment consisted of imagining a cat enclosed in a steel box with a radioactive material, a Geiger counter and a canister of hydrocyanic acid. If one of the atoms of the radioactive material decays, the Geiger counter registers it and breaks a canister releasing the hydrocyanic acid which kills the cat. The probability of this happening within a given time, an hour say, is equal to the probability of it not happening. Expressed as a psi-function of the entire system, it’s true to say that as long as the steel box is closed, the cat is both dead and alive at the same time. It is only when you open the box, that the cat is discovered to be either dead or alive.”

“It was you who sent us the Greek letter? The ψ?” said Ringer.

“Of course. What did you read at university?”

“Philosophy.”

“Philosophy? Well, you should have been able to work it all out when you received the ψ.”

“What have you done with them?” Stafford thumped the table as he barked the question.

“I have recruited them to help me in an experiment of my own. I have recreated the conditions suggested by Schrodinger. Not in my head – in the basement of the physics department! Thought experiments are for pussies!”

“What do you mean, you’ve recreated the conditions?” asked Ringer.

“Oh, come on. You’re a graduate. You should be able to work it out for yourself.”

“You mean you have a sealed steel box, containing  a Geiger counter, with a small amount of a radioactive substance and a poisonous gas canister.”

“Actually, there are three steel boxes. One has to be able to replicate one’s results.”

“And there are cats in the boxes? The students are monitoring what happens?” Ringer was hopeful.

“Well, no. Schrodinger’s experiment was always objected to on the grounds of cruelty to animals. So I replaced the cats with graduate students.”

“Right. Let’s get over there and get them out,” said Stafford, rising from his seat.

“Wait, Inspector!” cried Applebaum. “Don’t you see? While they are in the boxes they are at least both dead and alive. If you open the boxes, they will be either dead or alive. Are you prepared to take that risk? Isn’t it better that they exist in this strange dual state, rather than committing them to the possibility of death? You might save them, or you might kill them by opening the boxes.”

Professor Applebaum began to make miaowing noises. He bunched his fists like paws and licked the side of his hand, rubbing it over his face, like a cat grooming herself.

“I don’t need this,” said Stafford, shaking his head. “It’s Christmas Day. I should be at home with Mrs Stafford, opening up presents, not this mad man’s steel boxes.”

“Welcome to the post-Newtonian universe,” said DS Ringer.

“And you can shut it,” said DI Stafford.


Saturday, December 24th, 2011

The Eleventh Day of Twistmas (Twistery #34) Solution

“I am innocent!” declared Hélène, thereby proving her guilt.

 

Solution.

This is a true crime twistery. You can read about it in Colin And Damon Wilson’s book, Written in Blood: A History of Forensic Detection. My account is taken from there.

The interesting thing about true crimes, as opposed to the sort made up by over-imaginative writers like me, is that more often than not they are disappointingly straightforward. The criminals are not fiendish geniuses of evil, hatching convoluted conundrums that cannot be fathomed by anyone except the most cunning of detectives. They are, generally, a rather stupid bunch who give themselves away in the most idiotic manner.

This is a case in point. If it’s the least twisty of my twisteries, my defence is that this is what actually happened.

The year is 1851. A  Breton peasant by the name of Hélène Jegado was employed as a servant in the house of Professor Théophile Bidard of the University of Rennes. What Professor Bidard, and the other members of the household, did not know was that Hélène Jegado was a prolific poisoner, already responsible for the deaths of at least twenty three people, one of whom was her own sister.

As a domestic servant, she had access to arsenic, which was used as rat poison in those days. Being a bit of a nasty piece of work, Hélène saw no reason to limit her use of the substance to rodents.

I’ll let Wilson and Wilson take up the story:

“When a servant named Rosalie Sarrazin, of whom she was jealous, died in agony that July, an investigating magistrate accompanied police officers to the house. ‘I am innocent!’ declared Hélène without preamble. ‘Of what?’ asked the magistrate, ‘No one has accused you.’” (Wilson & Wilson, Written in Blood, Robinson 1989, p88.)

And so, by an unprompted declaration of innocence, she revealed her guilt. An investigation was launched into her past; the trail of death discovered. The amazing thing really is how she had managed to get away with so many murders, and for so long – her career as a murderer spanned twenty years.

That’s it. A real life twistery. I think I’ll go back to making them up.

 

 



All content © Copyright 2012 by R. N. Morris.
Subscribe to RSS Feed – Posts or just Comments

Powered by WordPress Designed by Colourform Based on Workaholic by Graph Paper Press