Bloody Blog

Friday, February 3rd, 2012

Adventures in e-publishing Part Five – The Bridge that Bunuel Built

All this week I’ve been looking at the rise of e-publishing. First there was a look at Michael Gregorio’s collection of satirical essays about living in Italy in the midst of a crisis. In the second of my ‘Adventures in e-Publishing’ I interviewed Lee Jackson, historical crime writer and the publisher of a series of interesting historical e-books. Next came an interview with successful self-publishing author Ian Hocking. And Yesterday I interviewed Kaye Lyall Grant, commissioning editor at Severn House/Creme de la Crime. I’ll be continuing the series with an interview with Kate Allan, who is not only a published author but also (as Kate Nash) a successful literary agent and publisher. It will be interesting to see her perspective!

Part of the reason I wanted to do this mini-series of posts is because I have myself put out an e-book, available through amazon for kindle or kindle-compatible readers. It’s called The Bridge That Buñuel Built.

To be honest, I’m not entirely sure why I have brought this book out at this particular time. Maybe just because I can. The whole thing is an experiment for me. Conventional wisdom from publishers is that you can’t sell short story collections, so I was fairly sure there wouldn’t be any interest in it from them. (I didn’t try.) The stories in the collection are themselves experiments. So it seemed right to publish this collection of experimental oddities in this experimental form. This is from my introduction:

“I don’t write short stories.” That’s what I tell people. And yet, somehow, here is a collection of short stories with my name on them.

Have I been lying all these years? I prefer to say I’ve been in denial. But why? My only excuse is the notorious difficulty of the short story form. To say I write short stories has always seemed too big a claim. Modesty forbids, and all that.

I don’t write short stories. I try things out, experiment, have a go. Take an idea and run with it. These are the results, sometimes playful, occasionally bizarre, invariably flawed.

The title story is a case in point. There was a Buñuel season on the TV at the time. I recorded several of the films and watched them back to back, Belle de Jour, followed by The Discreet Charm of the Bourgeoisie, followed by That Obscure Object of Desire. To be exposed to so much surrealism all at once obviously had an effect on me. It also coincided with a time in my life when my daily walk to the office took me past a sandwich bar called ‘Brunel’s’. It was named, I presumed, after the great civil engineer of the nineteenth century, Isambard Kingdom Brunel, designer amongst other things of the Clifton Suspension Bridge.

Now I have no idea why a sandwich bar had been named after an engineer. Perhaps Brunel had once been commissioned to create a new sandwich, having been confused with a chef of a similar name? I could only conjecture. As I pondered the mystery of that, I wondered whether a comparable confusion, in a parallel universe, might somehow have occurred between Brunel and Buñuel, whose names struck me as uncannily connected.

I must have been thinking a lot about Buñuel at the time, because every day I walked past the sandwich bar this thought occurred to me. I found that the only way I could release myself from this strange preoccupation was to write a story about it.

Whether this is the best way to go about writing a short story, I have no idea. But then again, I don’t write short stories.

 

Some stories in this collection have been published before. The bridge that Buñuel built first saw light on the Bloomsbury website; The Symptoms of his madness were as follows: originally appeared in Metropolitan magazine and subsequently in Abraxas; The Devil’s drum cropped up in Darkness Rising, Volume One and was turned into a one act opera by the composer Ed Hughes; Revenants won a competition run by Warpton Comics and so was published as a comic book with illustrations by Simon Mobbs; Stockshot City was published in Abraxas Unbound.

Adventures in e-Publishing Part One.

Adventures in e-Publishing Part Two.

Adventures in e-Publishing Part Three.

Adventures in e-Publishing Part Four.

Start reading The Bridge That Buñuel Built now!

 


Thursday, February 2nd, 2012

Adventures in e-publishing Part Four – interview with Kate Lyall Grant

KATE LYALL GRANT has worked in mainstream trade publishing for over twenty years.  In the past she’s been a senior commissioning editor at Hodder & Stoughton and Simon & Schuster UK, specialising in crime, thrillers and commercial women’s fiction, before joining independent publisher Severn House in 2010.  Kate is publisher of Creme de la Crime, a new imprint designed to showcase the best of British crime fiction.

There’s no doubt the advent of e-publishing has shaken things up in the publishing industry. I used an analogy in my interview with Lee Jackson, of conventional publishers being a bit like sail-makers in the age of steam. Playing devil’s advocate, you understand! Of course, people still buy sail boats. But it’s a tiny market and they’re all millionaires or men going through the mid-life crisis. Is this the future for print books? Are conventional publishers worried? Should they be?

This is obviously a time of huge innovation and change within the publishing industry – and I think it’s up to publishers to make the most of the new opportunities available, rather than worry about and shy away from the changed technological landscape. These are certainly exciting and interesting times to be working in publishing: e-books and everything that goes with them have the potential to bring enormous benefits as well as challenges for conventional publishers, who must be ready to adapt, embracing the opportunities to reach new readers while not losing sight of their regular, longstanding customers and core market.  There are still a great many people (like me) who prefer to read print books and I think they will be safe for the next generation at least.  After that, who knows?  Yes, there’s no question that e-books do detract from print sales but, for the next few years at least, it’s a finite market.  There is endless discussion within the publishing industry at the moment as to the future of the e-book, but the truth is that no one has the definitive answer at this stage.

I think I’m right in saying that you publish all Severn House books as e-books as well as in hardback and paperback editions. How significant a part of the business are e-book sales?

The Severn House e-book list was launched in June last year, so it’s still very early days for us to ascertain sales patterns etc.  As an independent hardcover publisher, our core business remains the libraries and we have no intention of neglecting our key customers who are the wholesalers and library suppliers.  Having said that, e-books is where we see our growth area in years to come and we are planning for a future where e-books will eventually make up the majority of our revenue.  The great thing is that, for the first time, e-books enable a small publishing company like us to compete on a level playing field with the big publishing houses – and I’m looking forward to doing exactly that!

Should e-books offer extra material that isn’t in the print edition? The i-Pad, for example, gives you the opportunity to put in video clips, snatches of music, an audio clip or two (the message left of the victim’s answerphone, that haunting melody that conjures up the past)… Is this all a distraction? Or do publishers need to become purveyors of multi-media entertainment?

Personally I would find the inclusion of extra material such as video clips, snatches of music etc an irritating distraction, preferring to give my imagination full flow to do the job. To me, it’s infantilising the reader – but I recognise I’m probably something of an old fogey in that respect and in years to come publishers will have adapted to cater for the tastes of new generations of readers who’ve been brought up from the outset to expect this kind of additional material.

Do you own a kindle, or an e-reader of any kind? If so, how do you use it?

I own a Sony e-reader onto which I download all manuscript submissions.  In that respect it’s made my job as an editor so much easier and it’s hard now to remember the days when my shoulder used to ache constantly, weighed down with a satchel full of hard-copy manuscripts to and from the office.  However, I much prefer to read print books than e-books: during my leisure hours, I really don’t feel like reading words on a e-screen having spent all day in front of a computer.  I suppose it’s how I differentiate my ‘pleasure reading’ from my ‘work reading’ (although the two are by no means mutually exclusive of course!).

Many writers are rushing to self-publish. Does this just reduce the slush-pile, or does it mean that a canny editor is now scouring self-published books in the hope of discovering a gem they can take to the next stage? Is everyone looking for the next Amanda Hocking?

There is so much self-published material out there, an over-burdened commissioning editor just doesn’t have the time to wade through the acres of chaff to get to the kernel of wheat.  For every Amanda Hocking, there are at least 10,000 also-rans, I suspect.  For this reason, mainstream publishers will generally only accept submissions via literary agents.  But yes, if a self-published e-book has sold upwards of 30,000 copies and is attracting rave reviews from readers, then it will attract attention from editors and should certainly be worth taking a look at.  Does it reduce the slush pile?  No, I don’t think so.  Every unpublished first-time writer I’ve worked with in my capacity as a freelance editor dreams of being in print – being published online simply doesn’t have the same cachet.

Does online piracy concern you? If so, what can we do about it? How do you persuade people that it’s worth paying for e-books?

Online piracy is a potential problem. I would never send out a PDF file of a manuscript to a potential reviewer or customer, for example, without ensuring that it’s pre-secured, so it can only be downloaded by the recipient themselves. Apart from general vigilance however, it’s hard to know what else we can do at this end apart from doing our bit to drive the lesson home to the reading public at every given opportunity that £5.99 (or whatever) is really not such a huge price to pay for a good book, into which a huge amount of time and effort has been invested by the author and all those who work with them – and that it is ultimately the reader who will lose out if authors find they can no longer afford to write for a living financially, and the quantity and quality of books available will therefore suffer.

Following on from the last question, what is a fair price for an e-book?

What is a fair price for an e-book?  Again, a subject of intense debate amongst publishers and retailers at the moment.  Personally, I loathe seeing e-books available at 99p or thereabouts: I think it devalues books as a commodity and takes no account of the fact that this is the product of, on average, a year’s work on the part of the author.  On the other hand, it’s better to be read than not read, and yes, there is certainly a case for making long out-of-print backlist titles available at a low price.  As far as new books are concerned, however, I personally wouldn’t want to see any priced lower than, say, £4.99 – and ideally rather higher than that.  But doubtless market forces will dictate.

Is the e-book changing the relationship between the author and the publisher?

Not in my experience, no – and I don’t see any reason why it should.  As publishers, our role is to make an author’s work as attractive or enticing as we can, then make it available and bring it to the attention of as many potential readers/customers as possible (budgetary constraints permitting!). E-rights are now an integral part of any mainstream publishing contract, and the e-book is simply another format in which publishers can make an author’s work available.

Who will be the winners and who the losers as e-books develop?

As long as e-books aren’t priced too ridiculously cheaply, as long as there’s healthy competition among online retailers (both of which are big ‘if’s), then I think publishers, authors, retailers and, not least, readers should all benefit from the e-book revolution.  The losers unfortunately – unless they can find a way to sell e-books effectively – will be the traditional bookshop chains – although there should still be room for independents, where the customer can benefit from the individual bookseller’s expertise and personal recommendations.

Read Adventures in e-Publishing Part One here.

Read Adventures in e-Publishing Part Two here.

Read Adventures in e-Publishing Part Three here.

Read Adventures in e-Publishing Part Five here.

 

In new window
Print all
Expand all

questions

 

X
Inbox
X

 

 

 

 

 

rogernmorris

Hi Kate, there are some questions attached. Feel free to ignore any that you …
31 Jan (1 day ago)
Reply
More

Kate Lyall Grant to rogernmorris

show details 31 Jan (1 day ago)
Hi Roger,
Not at all.  Responses below – please feel free to use as you wish:
1)    This is obviously a time of huge innovation and change within the publishing industry – and I think it’s up to publishers to make the most of the new opportunities available, rather than worry about and shy away from the changed technological landscape. These are certainly exciting and interesting times to be working in publishing: e-books and everything that goes with them have the potential to bring enormous benefits as well as challenges for conventional publishers, who must be ready to adapt, embracing the opportunities to reach new readers while not losing sight of their regular, longstanding customers and core market.  There are still a great many people (like me) who prefer to read print books and I think they will be safe for the next generation at least.  After that, who knows?  Yes, there’s no question that e-books do detract from print sales but, for the next few years at least, it’s a finite market.  There is endless discussion within the publishing industry at the moment as to the future of the e-book, but the truth is that no one has the definitive answer at this stage.
2)    The Severn House e-book list was launched in June last year, so it’s still very early days for us to ascertain sales patterns etc.  As an independent hardcover publisher, our core business remains the libraries and we have no intention of neglecting our key customers who are the wholesalers and library suppliers.  Having said that, e-books is where we see our growth area in years to come and we are planning for a future where e-books will eventually make up the majority of our revenue.  The great thing is that, for the first time, e-books enable a small publishing company like us to compete on a level playing field with the big publishing houses – and I’m looking forward to doing exactly that!
3)    Personally I would find the inclusion of extra material such as video clips, snatches of music etc an irritating distraction, preferring to give my imagination full flow to do the job. To me, it’s infantilising the reader – but I recognise I’m probably something of an old fogey in that respect and in years to come publishers will have adapted to cater for the tastes of new generations of readers who’ve been brought up from the outset to expect this kind of additional material.
4)    I own a Sony e-reader onto which I download all manuscript submissions.  In that respect it’s made my job as an editor so much easier and it’s hard now to remember the days when my shoulder used to ache constantly, weighed down with a satchel full of hard-copy manuscripts to and from the office.  However, I much prefer to read print books than e-books: during my leisure hours, I really don’t feel like reading words on a e-screen having spent all day in front of a computer.  I suppose it’s how I differentiate my ‘pleasure reading’ from my ‘work reading’ (although the two are by no means mutually exclusive of course!).
5)    There is so much self-published material out there, an over-burdened commissioning editor just doesn’t have the time to wade through the acres of chaff to get to the kernel of wheat.  For every Amanda Hocking, there are at least 10,000 also-rans, I suspect.  For this reason, mainstream publishers will generally only accept submissions via literary agents.  But yes, if a self-published e-book has sold upwards of 30,000 copies and is attracting rave reviews from readers, then it will attract attention from editors and should certainly be worth taking a look at.  Does it reduce the slush pile?  No, I don’t think so.  Every unpublished first-time writer I’ve worked with in my capacity as a freelance editor dreams of being in print – being published online simply doesn’t have the same cachet.
6)    Online piracy is a potential problem. I would never send out a PDF file of a manuscript to a potential reviewer or customer, for example, without ensuring that it’s pre-secured, so it can only be downloaded by the recipient themselves. Apart from general vigilance however, it’s hard to know what else we can do at this end apart from doing our bit to drive the lesson home to the reading public at every given opportunity that £5.99 (or whatever) is really not such a huge price to pay for a good book, into which a huge amount of time and effort has been invested by the author and all those who work with them – and that it is ultimately the reader who will lose out if authors find they can no longer afford to write for a living financially, and the quantity and quality of books available will therefore suffer.
7)      What is a fair price for an e-book?  Again, a subject of intense debate amongst publishers and retailers at the moment.  Personally, I loathe seeing e-books available at 99p or thereabouts: I think it devalues books as a commodity and takes no account of the fact that this is the product of, on average, a year’s work on the part of the author.  On the other hand, it’s better to be read than not read, and yes, there is certainly a case for making long out-of-print backlist titles available at a low price.  As far as new books are concerned, however, I personally wouldn’t want to see any priced lower than, say, £4.99 – and ideally rather higher than that.  But doubtless market forces will dictate.
8)    Not in my experience, no – and I don’t see any reason why it should.  As publishers, our role is to make an author’s work as attractive or enticing as we can, then make it available and bring it to the attention of as many potential readers/customers as possible (budgetary constraints permitting!). E-rights are now an integral part of any mainstream publishing contract, and the e-book is simply another format in which publishers can make an author’s work available.
9)    As long as e-books aren’t priced too ridiculously cheaply, as long as there’s healthy competition among online retailers (both of which are big ‘if’s), then I think publishers, authors, retailers and, not least, readers should all benefit from the e-book revolution.  The losers unfortunately – unless they can find a way to sell e-books effectively – will be the traditional bookshop chains – although there should still be room for independents, where the customer can benefit from the individual bookseller’s expertise and personal recommendations.
Hope that all makes sense and is what’s required.  Do let me know if you need any further info.
All best,
Kate
From: rachelyarham@blueyonder.co.uk [mailto:rachelyarham@blueyonder.co.uk] On Behalf Of rogernmorris
Sent: 31 January 2012 10:44
To: Kate Lyall Grant
Subject: questions
- Show quoted text -

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
______________________________________________________________________

Reply
Forward
Reply
More

rogernmorris to Kate

show details 31 Jan (1 day ago)
That’s fantastic Kate. Thanks so much. You make some great points.

 

Is there a brief bio anywhere that I can steal? A mug shot would be great too!

Roger

- Show quoted text -


www.rogernmorris.co.uk
http://cargocollective.com/rogermorriscopy/

 

Reply
Forward

Wednesday, February 1st, 2012

Adventures in e-publishing Part Three – interview with Ian Hocking

Dr Ian Hocking is the author of two techno-thrillers, Déjà Vu and Flashback, as well as a rites of passage comedy, Proper Job, and a short story collection, A Moment in Berlin. All of them self-published though amazon. In fact, his self-publishing exploits – and more particularly his sales success – have brought him to the attention of Nicholas Clee writing in The New Statesman.

Just to get this out of the way, any relation to Amanda Hocking?

Yes, we’ve been happily married for years. No – wait! We’re completely unconnected.

So congratulations on those sales, Ian. The last time I looked, Déjà Vu was number 6 in the amazon.co.uk technothriller ranking – for all book formats, not just kindle. That’s quite an achievement. To what do you owe your success?

Like most authors, I only have clues but no definitive answer. Déjà Vu itself was first published in 2005 by the UKA Press. There, it was edited by the talented Aliya Whitely. The UKA Press angle didn’t work for a variety of reasons. Meantime, I kept working on the book. I genuinely thought it was good – or, at least, that it was the kind of book I wanted to read. The next step was a near-miss from a larger publisher. I picked up literary representation on the back of this. Along the way, I recorded Déjà Vu as a podcast, and kept reworking the material. Eventually, when my agent couldn’t place the book, I gave up writing. There’s a post on my blog about it. I redrafted Déjà Vu again in line with a short report from Scott Pack, hired Clare Christian to give it a proper edit, and put it out for the Kindle. What I’m saying, in a roundabout way, is that I never tired of returning to the story of Déjà Vu and polishing it. Those years in the wilderness paid off in terms of the quality of the book. I don’t know how it compares to other publications out there, but it has certainly received more attention than most, both from the writer and its editors.

Déjà Vu was originally published as a paperback by Bluechrome publishing, to considerable acclaim, including a rave review in the Guardian. Why did you decide to bring out your own e-edition? How does self-publishing compare to being published by a small press?

It depends on the small press. My experience with UKA Press (which was bankrolled by Bluechrome at the time) was not, on the whole, a good one. I welcomed the opportunity to be fully in control of the process. Frankly, when an author is published by a small press (and maybe by a big press), the marketing work falls to him or her anyway, so there is little difference on that score. But the main thrust of the thinking behind self publication was to get the thing off my hard drive and ‘park’ it somewhere for posterity. I honestly, truly, thought nobody beyond my immediate friends and family would buy it. Publication via the Kindle is a dream come true. Putting aside for a moment the implications of Amazon for the publishing industry, a Kindle author has: monthly royalty payments; instant access to sales; a global distribution mechanism that costs nothing at the point of signing up; and the ability to make any and all corrections they see fit to the manuscript, continuously. Amazon has transformed publishing, but, more than that, it has provided a framework for books to find success based on their quality – and this is something new.

I believe Déjà Vu has also recently was a winner in the 2011 Red Adept Reviews Indie Award for Science Fiction. Congratulations again. Not only that, it has 67 reviews on amazon.co.uk. 67! So how do you go about getting reviews and how do you make sure they’re positive? (Apart from writing a brilliant book, of course!)

Imagine me flapping a hand at the computer and making an ‘Aw, shucks,’ face.

The review system is one of my favourite parts of Amazon. It provides a representative sample of responses from customers. That statement sounds banal until you consider that, for much of the history of traditional publishing, responses to books have been non-representative (i.e. professional critics, whose reading responses are often artificial), rarely from customers, and few in number.

I’ve set up a saved search for my name on Twitter. If I see that a person has tweeted about reading my book, I’ll send them a polite reply asking them to put a review on the Kindle store. More than a quarter of the reviews on the Kindle store are from people I’ve contacted. Otherwise, I always reply to emails that readers send me. It freaks them out; but I take their emails seriously. I don’t reply with canned responses, or ultra-short sentences that imply I’ve got better things to do than respond to fan mail. If I were to look at this coldly – which I don’t – I could say that I’m building personal relationships with customers and improving the odds that they’ll remember me and buy my books in future. But it’s just cool to get feedback. I’m interested in what people have to say.

Nicholas Clee, in that New Statesman article, suggested that, impressive as your sales are, you could have made more if you’d published by the conventional route. How do you answer that?

Yes, there’s a lengthy reply to Nicholas on my blog. He’s probably right. But the point is that I am one of the new guard: I make little money, but consistently, at one end of the tail. The Kindle publishing model suits people like me. I have a full time job as a researcher and lecturer, which I love, and I can write part time and earn money to invest in editing and covers.

If you’re doing so well pursuing the self-publishing route, why do you need a big-shot American agent? I hear you’ve recently been taken on by one.

At heart, it comes down to thinking one or two moves ahead. I will be forever grateful to Amazon for giving me the opportunity to reach people with my fiction. Nobody else wanted to do that. But I’m not sentimentally attached to the idea of ebooks. I’m into extended prose, whatever form it comes in, because I want people to read my work.

A few weeks ago I spoke to a very nice man who is the commissioning editor for a large UK publisher. He told me he thought Déjà Vu was great, but given that I’d already sold 11,000 units of Déjà Vu and Flashback combined, there was no market for them. I scratched my head for a minute or two. Then I went to the website of my email-buddy Gerard Jones, Everyone Who’s Anyone in Adult Trade Publishing, Newspapers, Magazines, Broadcasting and Tinseltown, Too, and looked up the contact details of some American agents.

I approached them with my reviews and sales data. Did they think the UK market could serve as a test case for how well the book might do in the US? More of them agreed, and more enthusiastically, than I had anticipated. Several phone calls later, I’m proud to say that I’m represented by Katherine Flynn at Kneerim & Williams. She’s brilliant and I’m genuinely looking forward to working with her.

What’s their view on your self-publishing endeavours? There was a time when this might have counted against an author. Has that changed?

Self-publishing once involved a considerable investment. Now, because it is trivially easy to publish via the Kindle, the number of people uploading their books makes for a larger group. It’s no longer a niche and more difficult for those within conventional publishing to stigmatise. There’s a recognition, I think, that it is a legitimate route for a writer who has not been able to secure a traditional deal.

And it was ever true that nothing succeeds like success. A few years back, G. P. Taylor was viewed as a self-publishing hero because he sold so many copies of his fantasy series. If he hadn’t, maybe people would see him as a sad bastard. Self-publishing success shows that people want to buy your work. That addresses the anxiety of most publishers.


You famously announced on your blog that you’ve given up writing fiction. Still the case?

No, I’m writing again. However, I’ve never made a decision that made me more relaxed, normal and relieved in the short term. I could spend more time reading, playing my guitar and piano, and getting more involved in life. Then my books became successful. I’m back to daydreaming and filing away the horrors of the everyday into drawers marked ‘Useful’. I’m sweating over metaphors. And happy.

You’re a man who’s looked into the future. Is conventional publishing dead? And if so, should we be sorry?

Conventional publishing is going to shrink further than it has already. Physical books will become rare because their technology is not as conducive to fiction as electronic readers. However, there is still a role for middlemen to play. I want to write; I don’t want to be hand-coding the paragraphs, booking adverts, or hiring proofreaders.

Any advice for anyone foolish enough to dip a toe into the self-publishing waters (me, for instance)? What are the pitfalls?

Advice: Do it. Remember that there is a correlation, for all books, between quality and sales, but your own book might be an outlier. Load the dice in your favour by making the text as good as possible. Usually, that means hiring people to take care of all the stages of editing. The cover needs to be great. You, Roger, already have a goddamn great cover. The price needs to be low. If you picture your own book against an established author in the same genre, ask yourself why a person is going to spend money on you. Price is a huge factor in that. I have a lot of feedback from readers who say that my book was so cheap they figured what the hell. Then they wrote a nice review; told their friends; and bought the next in the series at a higher price. I wouldn’t benefit from that if I hadn’t hooked them with something from the beginning.

I’m struggling to think of pitfalls. It is possible that you’ll spend money on editing, on the cover, and make no money back. But this can only be a few hundred quid. That’s not loose change, by any means, but remember that Amazon (or whoever) has sunk many of the distribution costs already. This won’t be like self-publishing was ten years ago. And isn’t your book worth the money? It probably is. It can be an ebook for a very long time indeed.

Adventures in e-publishing Part One.

Adventures in e-publishing Part Two.

Adventures in e-publishing Part Four.

Adventures in e-Publishing Part Five here.

Ian Hocking blogs here.



All content © Copyright 2012 by R. N. Morris.
Subscribe to RSS Feed – Posts or just Comments

Powered by WordPress Designed by Colourform Based on Workaholic by Graph Paper Press